We are building the thing that does the work. This page is the honest version — what the alternatives get right, where they stop, and what we believe strongly enough to build a company around.
None of these are bad choices. Each is a reasonable answer to a slightly different question than the one an Indian tour desk is asking.
What it gets right
Free, infinitely flexible, and every senior person on your desk already knows it. There is a real reason most Indian agencies still run this way.
Where it stops
It stores your work but does none of it. Nothing is connected, two people cannot work on the same file, and you learn your real margin months after the trip ended.
What it gets right
Good pipelines, good reminders, and cheap. Fine if your business were selling a product off a shelf.
Where it stops
It has no concept of a day-wise itinerary, a seasonal rate contract, a voucher or a duty sheet. The actual travel work happens outside it, so the CRM slowly becomes a contact list nobody updates.
What it gets right
Genuinely good software, built by people who understand tour operations. If you ran a DMC in Lisbon, we would tell you to look at them first.
Where it stops
They are systems of record — the team still does the research, the writing and the data entry. And GST, TCS, WhatsApp and rupee pricing are yours to work around on every booking.
What it gets right
Strong on flight and hotel booking engines with supplier API connectivity, and priced for this market.
Where it stops
Built around reselling inventory, not around designing custom trips. Bespoke itinerary design, contracted rate costing and DMC operations are usually the thinnest part of the product.
These decide what gets built and, more usefully, what does not.
A tour desk is not slow because its data is untidy. It is slow because researching a destination, planning a route, writing an itinerary and typing a rate card take human hours. Better forms do not give those hours back. That is the whole thesis of this product.
A model that invents a boutique hotel in Munnar is worse than useless — it puts your reputation on a page you signed. Ours starts from your contracted rates, your past itineraries and your writing, and says so when it has nothing to work from.
Every extra module is another thing to configure, train staff on and pay for. We would rather be narrow and finished than broad and perpetually 70% done.
GST treatment, TCS, WhatsApp and rupee economics are not a localisation layer. Build them in late and they leak into every workflow as a manual step.
A twenty-person agency can put a junior on research. A five-person one cannot. The AI is aimed squarely at agencies that have never had spare hands.
We are pre-launch and we label every module in build, coming soon or planned. You will always be able to tell what exists from what we intend to build.
AI in travel software has a bad habit of confidently inventing things. These constraints exist so that never reaches your client.
See what the AI actually doesNothing reaches a client, a supplier or an invoice without a human pressing send. AI fills the blank page; the judgement stays yours.
Your rate cards, your past itineraries, your conversion history, your house voice. A generic model writing generic itineraries helps nobody.
Every suggestion — a price, a drive time, a margin warning — comes with what it was based on, so you can disagree with it on evidence.
Your rates, clients and margins are yours. They are not pooled with other agencies and not used to train models for anyone else.
We would rather say this now than three months into an onboarding that was never going to work.
MyDMC Pro is still being built. We are lining up a small group of Indian tour operators and DMCs to onboard as each module becomes ready. Tell us how you work today and we will tell you honestly whether — and when — it will fit.
No card, no commitment, no trial clock running. We will only invite you in once the modules you actually need are ready.